Updates on LI‐RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI

Author:

Patel Richa1,Aslam Anum2,Parikh Neehar D.3,Mervak Benjamin2,Mubarak Eman2,Higgins Lily2,Lala Kayli2,Conner Jack F.4,Khaykin Valerie5,Bashir Mustafa6,Do Richard Kinh Gian7ORCID,Burke Lauren M. B.8,Smith Elainea N.9,Kim Charles Y.6,Shampain Kimberly L.2,Owen Dawn10,Mendiratta‐Lala Mishal2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Stanford California USA

2. Department of Radiology University of Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Department of Radiology University of Toledo Medical Center Toledo Ohio USA

5. Department of Radiology and Hepatology University of Michigan Medicine Michigan USA

6. Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

7. Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

8. Department of Radiology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

9. Department of Radiology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

10. Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA

Abstract

As the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subsequent treatments with liver‐directed therapies rise, the complexity of assessing lesion response has also increased. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI‐RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI‐RADS TRA) was created to standardize the assessment of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) on contrast‐enhanced CT or MRI. Originally created based on expert opinion, these guidelines are currently undergoing revision based on emerging evidence. While many studies support the use of LR‐TRA for evaluation of HCC response after thermal ablation and intra‐arterial embolic therapy, data suggest a need for refinements to improve assessment after radiation therapy. In this manuscript, we review expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, clarify how to apply the current LI‐RADS TRA by type of LRT, explore emerging literature on LI‐RADS TRA, and highlight future updates to the algorithm.Evidence Level3.Technical EfficacyStage 2.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3