Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychiatry Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA
Abstract
AbstractBehaviors that would otherwise be considered criminal acts, but occur in the context of a sleep disorder, pose challenges to the traditional application of legal principles of criminal responsibility. Determining the degree to which consciousness is present during such behaviors becomes a necessary step in assigning criminal culpability. Historically, legal defense theories of unconsciousness, automatism, and insanity have been raised to negate culpability for parasomnia related behaviors. Accordingly, proper assessment of sleep disorders in the context of criminal charges becomes critical in assisting the functions of the justice system. This article reviews principles related to the legal tradition, expert assessment, and elements of expert testimony related to criminal behaviors and sleep disorders.
Reference32 articles.
1. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL). (2005).Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Available athttps://www.aapl.org/ethics.htm
2. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. (2014).International classification of sleep disorders(3rd ed.). (ICSD‐3). Darien IL AASM.
3. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
4. The Medicolegal Aspects of Automatism
5. Impulsive acts and confusional states during incomplete arousal from sleep: Criminological and forensic implications