Scoring festination and gait freezing in people with Parkinson's: The freezing of gait severity tool‐revised

Author:

Scully Aileen E.1ORCID,Tan Dawn23,Oliveira Beatriz Ito Ramos de1,Hill Keith D.4,Clark Ross5,Pua Yong Hao36

Affiliation:

1. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Bentley Western Australia Australia

2. Health and Social Sciences Singapore Institute of Technology Singapore Singapore

3. Department of Physiotherapy Singapore General Hospital Singapore Singapore

4. Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. School of Health University of the Sunshine Coast Sunshine Coast Queensland Australia

6. Medicine Academic Programme Duke‐NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore Singapore

Abstract

AbstractBackground and PurposeTo improve existing clinical assessments for freezing of gait (FOG) severity, a new clinician‐rated tool which integrates the varied types of freezing (FOG Severity Tool‐Revised) was developed. This cross‐sectional study investigated its validity and reliability.MethodsPeople with Parkinson's disease who were able to independently ambulate eight‐metres and understand study instructions were consecutively recruited from outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Those with co‐morbidities severely affecting gait were excluded. Participants were assessed with the FOG Severity Tool‐Revised, three functional performance tests, the FOG Questionnaire, and outcomes measuring anxiety, cognition, and disability. The FOG Severity Tool‐Revised was repeated for test‐retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were computed for structural validity and internal consistency. Reliability and measurement error were estimated with ICC (two‐way, random), standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change (SDC95). Criterion‐related and construct validity were calculated with Spearman's correlations.ResultsThirty‐nine participants were enrolled [79.5% (n = 31) male; Median (IQR): age–73.0 (9.0) years; disease duration–4.0 (5.8) years], with fifteen (38.5%) who reported no medication state change contributing a second assessment for reliability estimation. The FOG Severity Tool‐Revised demonstrated sufficient structural validity and internal consistency (α = 0.89–0.93), and adequate criterion‐related validity compared to the FOG Questionnaire (ρ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.85). Test‐retest reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95%CI 0.86–0.99) and random measurement error (%SDC95 = 10.4%) was acceptable in this limited sample.Discussion and ConclusionsThe FOG Severity Tool‐Revised appeared valid in this initial sample of people with Parkinson's. While its psychometric properties remain to be confirmed in a larger sample, it may be considered for use in the clinical setting.

Funder

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3