Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the camouflaging autistic traits questionnaire

Author:

Hongo Minako1,Oshima Fumiyo12ORCID,Guan Siqing3,Takahashi Toru45,Nitta Yusuke1,Seto Mikuko1,Hull Laura6ORCID,Mandy William7ORCID,Ohtani Toshiyuki28,Tamura Masaki9,Shimizu Eiji129

Affiliation:

1. Research Center for Child Mental Development Chiba University Chiba Japan

2. United Graduate School of Child Development Osaka University, Kanazawa University; Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, and University of Fukui Osaka Japan

3. Graduate School of Human Sciences Waseda University Saitama Japan

4. Laureate Insutitute for Brain Research Tulsa USA

5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Tokyo Japan

6. Centre for Academic Mental Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK

7. Reserch Department for Clinial, Educational & Health Psychology University College London London UK

8. Safety and Health Organization Chiba University Chiba Japan

9. Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University Chiba Japan

Abstract

AbstractThis study investigated the factor structure and determined the reliability and validity of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire–Japanese version (CAT‐Q‐J) among 204 autistic and 410 non‐autistic people. Since a confirmatory factor analysis revealed no factor validity of the CAT‐Q‐J for both autistic and non‐autistic adults, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ensure the psychometric properties matched those of the original scale as much as possible. The results showed the CAT‐Q‐J comprised three subscales, a four‐item compensation subscale, a five‐item masking scale, and a five‐item assimilation subscale. The overall CAT‐Q‐J and all three subscales showed sufficient internal consistency and moderate‐to‐good and stable test–retest reliability in both the autistic and non‐autistic samples. Convergent validity was also supported by the correlations found with measures of autistic traits, well‐being, anxiety, and depression. Different from the original CAT‐Q, compensation/masking for the autistic sample was not correlated with mental health or autistic traits. The reliability and the validity of the overall CAT‐Q‐J were confirmed; however, caution should be exercised when interpreting its subscales.

Funder

Mental Health Okamoto Memorial Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3