Comparing family‐based treatment with inpatient treatment in youth with anorexia nervosa eligible for hospitalization: A 12‐month feasibility study

Author:

Haas Verena1ORCID,Wechsung Katja2ORCID,Kaiser Vivien1ORCID,Schmidt Janine1ORCID,Raile Klemens3ORCID,Busjahn Andreas4ORCID,Le Grange Daniel567ORCID,Correll Christoph U.18910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Center for Social‐Pediatric Care/Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

3. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

4. HealthTwiSt GmbH Berlin Germany

5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California, San Francisco San Francisco USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences The University of Chicago (Emeritus) Chicago USA

7. Berlin Institute of Health Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

8. Psychiatry Research The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health Glen Oaks NY USA

9. Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead NY USA

10. German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Berlin Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveFamily‐based treatment (FBT) for youth with anorexia nervosa (AN), has not been compared to inpatient, multimodal treatment (IMT).MethodProspective, non‐randomized pilot feasibility study of adolescents with AN receiving FBT (n = 31), and as a reference point for exploratory outcome comparisons IMT (n = 31), matched for baseline age and percent median BMI (%mBMI). Feasibility of FBT in youth fulfilling criteria for IMT was assessed via study recruitment and retention rates; acceptability via drop‐out and caregiver strain; safety via adverse events; preliminary treatment effectiveness between groups was assessed via a change in %mBMI, AN psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire, EDE‐Q), and hospital days, over 12 months with intent‐to‐treat, mixed models repeated measures analyses covering post‐intervention usual care until 12 months.ResultsTaking into account that 8 FBT patients (25.8%) crossed over to IMT due to lack of weight gain or psychiatric concerns, FBT and IMT were similarly feasible, acceptable, and safe, apart from more physical antagonism toward others in FBT (p = .010). FBT lasted longer (median [interquartile range, IQR]; 33.6 [17.4, 49.9] vs. 17.3 [14.4, 24] weeks, p < .001), but required fewer hospital days than IMT (median, [IQR], FBT = 1 [0, 16] vs. IMT = 123 [101, 180], p < .001). Baseline comorbidity‐adjusted changes over 12 months did not differ between groups in %mBMI (FBT = 12.6 ± 11.9 vs. IMT = 13.7 ± 9.1; p = .702) and EDE‐Q global score (median, [IQR]; FBT = −1.2 [−2.3, 0.2] vs. IMT = −1.3 [−2.8, −0.4]; p = .733).DiscussionImplementing FBT in this pilot study was feasible, acceptable, and safe for youth eligible for IMT according to German S3 guidelines. Non‐inferiority of FBT versus IMT requires confirmation in a sufficiently large multicenter RCT.Public SignificanceThis pilot study with 62 adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa demonstrated that for 2/3rd of patients eligible for a long hospitalization in the German health care system, outpatient, Family‐based treatment (FBT) was a safe and feasible treatment alternative. Over 12 months, FBT lead to similar weight gain and reduction in eating disorder cognitions as inpatient treatment with fewer hospital days. This pilot study needs to be followed up by a larger, multicenter trial.

Funder

Berlin Institute of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3