Affiliation:
1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
2. Center for Social‐Pediatric Care/Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
3. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
4. HealthTwiSt GmbH Berlin Germany
5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California, San Francisco San Francisco USA
6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences The University of Chicago (Emeritus) Chicago USA
7. Berlin Institute of Health Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
8. Psychiatry Research The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health Glen Oaks NY USA
9. Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead NY USA
10. German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Berlin Germany
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveFamily‐based treatment (FBT) for youth with anorexia nervosa (AN), has not been compared to inpatient, multimodal treatment (IMT).MethodProspective, non‐randomized pilot feasibility study of adolescents with AN receiving FBT (n = 31), and as a reference point for exploratory outcome comparisons IMT (n = 31), matched for baseline age and percent median BMI (%mBMI). Feasibility of FBT in youth fulfilling criteria for IMT was assessed via study recruitment and retention rates; acceptability via drop‐out and caregiver strain; safety via adverse events; preliminary treatment effectiveness between groups was assessed via a change in %mBMI, AN psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire, EDE‐Q), and hospital days, over 12 months with intent‐to‐treat, mixed models repeated measures analyses covering post‐intervention usual care until 12 months.ResultsTaking into account that 8 FBT patients (25.8%) crossed over to IMT due to lack of weight gain or psychiatric concerns, FBT and IMT were similarly feasible, acceptable, and safe, apart from more physical antagonism toward others in FBT (p = .010). FBT lasted longer (median [interquartile range, IQR]; 33.6 [17.4, 49.9] vs. 17.3 [14.4, 24] weeks, p < .001), but required fewer hospital days than IMT (median, [IQR], FBT = 1 [0, 16] vs. IMT = 123 [101, 180], p < .001). Baseline comorbidity‐adjusted changes over 12 months did not differ between groups in %mBMI (FBT = 12.6 ± 11.9 vs. IMT = 13.7 ± 9.1; p = .702) and EDE‐Q global score (median, [IQR]; FBT = −1.2 [−2.3, 0.2] vs. IMT = −1.3 [−2.8, −0.4]; p = .733).DiscussionImplementing FBT in this pilot study was feasible, acceptable, and safe for youth eligible for IMT according to German S3 guidelines. Non‐inferiority of FBT versus IMT requires confirmation in a sufficiently large multicenter RCT.Public SignificanceThis pilot study with 62 adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa demonstrated that for 2/3rd of patients eligible for a long hospitalization in the German health care system, outpatient, Family‐based treatment (FBT) was a safe and feasible treatment alternative. Over 12 months, FBT lead to similar weight gain and reduction in eating disorder cognitions as inpatient treatment with fewer hospital days. This pilot study needs to be followed up by a larger, multicenter trial.
Funder
Berlin Institute of Health
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa;Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi;2024-05-03
2. The diagnosis and treatment of anorexia nervosa in childhood and adolescence;Deutsches Ärzteblatt international;2024-03-08