How do different types and characteristics of green space impact mental health? A scoping review

Author:

Beute F.123ORCID,Marselle M. R.45ORCID,Olszewska‐Guizzo A.67ORCID,Andreucci M. B.8,Lammel A.9ORCID,Davies Z. G.10ORCID,Glanville J.11ORCID,Keune H.12ORCID,O'Brien L.13ORCID,Remmen R.14ORCID,Russo A.15ORCID,de Vries S.16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

2. LightGreen Health Østre Gausdal Norway

3. Psychology Department Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Lillehammer Norway

4. Environmental Psychology Research Group, School of Psychology University of Surrey Guildford UK

5. Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Leipzig Germany

6. Neurolandscape Foundation Warsawa Poland

7. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore

8. Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

9. UR Laboratoire Paragraphe Université Paris 8 Paris France

10. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK

11. York Health Economics Consortium University of York York UK

12. Department Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

13. Forest Research Society and Environment Research Group Farnham UK

14. Centre for General Practice University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

15. School of Arts University of Gloucestershire Cheltenham UK

16. Wageningen Environmental Research/Cultural Geography Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Green space matters for mental health but is under constant pressure in an increasingly urbanising world. Often there is little space available in cities for green areas, so it is vital to optimise the design and usage of these available green spaces. To achieve this, experts in planning, design and nature conservation need to know which types and characteristics of green spaces are most beneficial for residents' mental health. A scoping review of studies that compare different green space types and characteristics on mental health was conducted. A total of 215 (experimental, observational and qualitative) papers were included in the scoping review. This review highlights a high level of heterogeneity in study design, geographical locations, mental health outcomes and green space measures. Few of the included studies were specifically designed to enable direct comparisons between green space types and characteristics (e.g. between parks and forests). The included studies have predominantly experimental research designs looking at the effects of short‐term exposure to green space on short‐term mental health outcomes (e.g. affect and physiological stress). More studies enabled only indirect comparisons, either within the same study or between different studies. Analysis of the direction of the mental health outcomes (positive, neutral, negative) from exposure to various types and characteristics of green space found positive (i.e. beneficial) effects across all green space types. However, green space characteristics did appear to render more diverse effects on mental health, which is especially the case for vegetation characteristics (e.g. higher vegetation density can be negative for mental health). The scoping review reveals gaps in the present evidence base, with a specific need for more studies directly comparing green space types and characteristics within the same study. Proposed future research directions include the use of longitudinal research designs focusing on green space characteristics, considering actual exposure and systematically addressing heterogeneity in factors influencing the relation between green spaces and mental health (e.g. type of interaction, user experience). Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

University of Surrey

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3