Sex‐based treatment and outcomes for coronary bifurcation stenting: A report from the e‐ULTIMASTER registry

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions can be technically challenging and is associated with higher risk. There is little data on sex‐based differences in strategy and outcomes in bifurcation PCI.AimsWe sought to assess whether differences exist between women and men in the treatment and outcomes of bifurcation PCI.MethodsWe collected data on 4006 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI, from the e‐ULTIMASTER study, a prospective, multicentre study enrolling patients from 2014 to 2018. We divided the bifurcation cohort according to sex, with 1‐year follow‐up of outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF], target vessel failure [TVF], and patient‐oriented composite endpoint [POCE]).FindingsWomen were older (69.2 ± 10.9 years vs. 64.4 ± 11.0 years), with a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities. For true and non‐true bifurcation lesions, women and men were equally likely to undergo a single stent approach (true: 63.2% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.79, non‐true: 95.4% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.32), with similar rates of final kissing balloon (FKB) (37.2% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.36) and proximal optimization (POT) (34.4% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.93) in cases where two stents were used. Lastly, after propensity score matching, there was no difference between women and men in the incidence of the composite endpoints of TLF (5.5% vs. 5.2%, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.77−1.44], p = 0.75), TVF (6.2% vs. 6.3%, RR 0.99 [95% CI 0.74−1.32], p = 0.96), and POCE (9.9% vs. 9.5%, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.83−1.31], p = 0.70).ConclusionIn this contemporary, real‐world study of bifurcation PCI, we report no difference in stent strategy between women and men, with similar outcomes at 1‐year.