Effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with non‐psychotic mental health problems: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Author:

Slade Mike12,Rennick‐Egglestone Stefan1,Elliott Rachel A.3,Newby Chris4,Robinson Clare5,Gavan Sean P.3,Paterson Luke3,Ali Yasmin1,Yeo Caroline16,Glover Tony7,Pollock Kristian8,Callard Felicity9,Priebe Stefan10,Thornicroft Graham11,Repper Julie12,Keppens Jeroen13,Smuk Melanie14,Franklin Donna15,Walcott Rianna16,Harrison Julian15,Smith Roger15,Robotham Dan17,Bradstreet Simon18,Gillard Steve19,Cuijpers Pim2021,Farkas Marianne22,Zeev Dror Ben23,Davidson Larry24,Kotera Yasuhiro125,Roe James26,Ng Fiona1,Llewellyn‐Beardsley Joy1,

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

2. Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Health and Community Participation Division Nord University Namsos Norway

3. Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care University of Manchester Manchester UK

4. School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

5. Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit Queen Mary University of London London UK

6. Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

7. DRT Software Nottingham UK

8. School of Health Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

9. School of Geographical & Earth Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

10. Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry East London NHS Foundation Trust London UK

11. Centre for Implementation Science and Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK

12. ImROC Nottingham UK

13. Department of Informatics King's College London London UK

14. Centre for Genomics and Child Health Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London London UK

15. NEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel Nottingham UK

16. Black Communication and Technology Lab, Department of Communication University of Maryland College Park MD USA

17. McPin Foundation London UK

18. Institute of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

19. School of Health Sciences, City University of London London UK

20. Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

21. International Institute for Psychotherapy Babes¸‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania

22. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Boston University Boston MA USA

23. School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA

24. Yale School of Medicine Yale University New Haven CT USA

25. Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research Osaka University Osaka Japan

26. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

Abstract

Narratives describing first‐hand experiences of recovery from mental health problems are widely available. Emerging evidence suggests that engaging with mental health recovery narratives can benefit people experiencing mental health problems, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted as yet. We developed the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention, a web application providing self‐guided and recommender systems access to a collection of recorded mental health recovery narratives (n=659). We investigated whether NEON Intervention access benefited adults experiencing non‐psychotic mental health problems by conducting a pragmatic parallel‐group randomized trial, with usual care as control condition. The primary endpoint was quality of life at week 52 assessed by the Manchester Short Assessment (MANSA). Secondary outcomes were psychological distress, hope, self‐efficacy, and meaning in life at week 52. Between March 9, 2020 and March 26, 2021, we recruited 1,023 participants from across England (the target based on power analysis was 994), of whom 827 (80.8%) identified as White British, 811 (79.3%) were female, 586 (57.3%) were employed, and 272 (26.6%) were unemployed. Their mean age was 38.4±13.6 years. Mood and/or anxiety disorders (N=626, 61.2%) and stress‐related disorders (N=152, 14.9%) were the most common mental health problems. At week 52, our intention‐to‐treat analysis found a significant baseline‐adjusted difference of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.01‐0.26, p=0.041) in the MANSA score between the intervention and control groups, corresponding to a mean change of 1.56 scale points per participant, which indicates that the intervention increased quality of life. We also detected a significant baseline‐adjusted difference of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.05‐0.40, p=0.014) between the groups in the score on the “presence of meaning” subscale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, corresponding to a mean change of 1.1 scale points per participant. We found an incremental gain of 0.0142 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) (95% credible interval: 0.0059 to 0.0226) and a £178 incremental increase in cost (95% credible interval: –£154 to £455) per participant, generating an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of £12,526 per QALY compared with usual care. This was lower than the £20,000 per QALY threshold used by the National Health Service in England, indicating that the intervention would be a cost‐effective use of health service resources. In the subgroup analysis including participants who had used specialist mental health services at baseline, the intervention both reduced cost (–£98, 95% credible interval: –£606 to £309) and improved QALYs (0.0165, 95% credible interval: 0.0057 to 0.0273) per participant as compared to usual care. We conclude that the NEON Intervention is an effective and cost‐effective new intervention for people experiencing non‐psychotic mental health problems.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3