Advanced imaging use and delays among inpatients with psychiatric comorbidity

Author:

Bartsch Emily1ORCID,Shin Saeha2,Sheehan Kathleen34,Fralick Michael15,Verma Amol1267,Razak Fahad1267,Lapointe‐Shaw Lauren178

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Centre for Mental Health University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Division of General Internal Medicine Sinai Health Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Division of General Internal Medicine Unity Health Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Division of General Internal Medicine University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo determine whether presence of a psychiatric comorbidity impacts use of inpatient imaging tests and subsequent wait times.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to General Internal Medicine (GIM) at five academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario from 2010 to 2019. Exposure was presence of a coded psychiatric comorbidity on admission. Primary outcome was time to test, as calculated from the time of test ordering to time of test completion, for computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion. Multilevel mixed‐effects models were used to identify predictors of time to test, and marginal effects were used to calculate differences in absolute units (h). Secondary outcome was the rate of each type of test included. Subgroup analyses were performed according to type of psychiatric comorbidity: psychotic, mood/anxiety, or substance use disorder.ResultsThere were 196,819 GIM admissions from 2010to 2019. In 77,562 admissions, ≥1 advanced imaging test was performed. After adjusting for all covariates, presence of any psychiatric comorbidity was associated with increased time to test for MRI (adjusted difference: 5.3 h, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9–6.8), PICC (adjusted difference: 3.7 h, 95% CI: 1.6–5.8), and ultrasound (adjusted difference: 3.0 h, 95% CI: 2.3–3.8), but not for CT (adjusted difference: 0.1 h, 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.5). Presence of any psychiatric comorbidity was associated with lower rate of ordering for all test types (adjusted difference: −17.2 tests per 100 days hospitalization, interquartile range: −18.0 to −16.3).ConclusionsThere was a lower rate of ordering of advanced imaging among patients with psychiatric comorbidity. Once ordered, time to test completion was longer for MRI, ultrasound, and PICC. Further exploration, such as quantifying rates of cancelled tests and qualitative studies evaluating hospital, provider, and patient barriers to timely advanced imaging, will be helpful in elucidating causes for these disparities.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3