Comparative analysis of prescription patterns and errors in government versus private hospitals in Dhaka: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Samad Md Abdus12ORCID,Sikdar K. M. Yasif Kayes3ORCID,Munia Ashfia Tasnim4,Patwary Farhan Tanvir5ORCID,Sarkar Md Raihan3,Rashed Md. Rashidul Islam3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh

2. Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences State University of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh

3. Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh

4. Institute of Statistical Research and Training University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh

5. Department of Pharmacy University of Asia Pacific Dhaka Bangladesh

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesPrescription errors can inadvertently compromise the effectiveness and increase the risk of adverse events. This study aims to compare prescription patterns and errors between government and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, by evaluating the World Health Organization (WHO) prescription indicators, polypharmacy, and omission errors.MethodsBetween September 2021 and November 2021, a total of 399 prescriptions were collected from outpatient departments of various government and private hospitals from patients or their attendants. The data were analyzed using the statistical package STATA 15. Chi‐square and Fisher's exact test were employed to determine associations (p < 0.05) among various types of categorical data.ResultsOf the collected prescriptions, 48% (n = 192) were from government, while 52% (n = 207) were from private hospitals. The mean number of medicines per prescription was 5.16 for government and 5.87 for private hospitals. Generic names were absent (0%) in both types of hospitals. Antibiotics were present in 34.37% of prescriptions from government and 51.69% from private hospitals. Moreover, injection were found in 17.70% of government and 18.35% of private hospitals' prescriptions. Government hospitals adhered to 67.97% of the essential drug list, whereas private hospitals adhered to 80.42%. Associations between hospital types were observed in missing age, and comorbidities, while no association was found in inscription mistakes. Missing dates and signatures were also associated with hospital types. Polypharmacy was observed in 49.47% of government hospitals and 71.01% of private hospitals. Additionally, polypharmacy in females, pediatrics, geriatrics, and missing comorbidity were also associated with hospital types (p < 0.05).ConclusionBoth government and private hospitals exhibited similar deviations from the WHO prescribing indicators. While government hospitals showed more omission errors, private hospitals exhibited higher rates of polypharmacy. Physicians in both types of hospitals should be vigilant about omission errors, maintain the WHO prescribing indicators, and minimize polypharmacy.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference37 articles.

1. What constitutes good prescribing?

2. What is a prescribing error?

3. Medication errors: prescribing faults and prescription errors

4. TariqRA VashishtR SinhaA et al. Medication dispensing errors and prevention. 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3