The Adaptive Systemic Approach: Catalysing more just and sustainable outcomes from sustainability and natural resources development research

Author:

Palmer Carolyn1ORCID,Tanner Jane1ORCID,Akanmu James2ORCID,Alamirew Tena3ORCID,Bamutaze Yazidhi4ORCID,Banadda Noble4ORCID,Cleaver Frances5ORCID,Faye Serigne6ORCID,Kabenge Isa4ORCID,Kane Alioune6ORCID,Longe Ezechiel2ORCID,Nobert Joel7ORCID,Nsengimana Venuste8ORCID,Speight Vanessa9ORCID,Weston Sally9ORCID,Winter Kevin10ORCID,Woldu Zerihun3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Water Research Rhodes University Grahamstown South Africa

2. University of Lagos Lagos Nigeria

3. Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia

4. Makerere University Kampala Uganda

5. Lancaster University Lancaster UK

6. University Cheik Anta Diop Dakar Senegal

7. University Dar es Salaam Dar es Salaam Tanzania

8. University of Rwanda Kigali Rwanda

9. University of Sheffield UK

10. University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

Abstract

AbstractIt has become increasingly common to include participatory processes, several academic disciplines, and additional wide‐ranging ways of knowing, in using research to tackle the escalating environmental problems of the 21st Century. There are barriers to the success of these efforts. In this paper we present the Adaptive Systemic Approach (ASA). The ASA is designed to provide a clear pathway for research related to sustainability issues, river basin problems and natural resource development, and to deliver change towards improved ecological health and social justice outcomes. The design of the ASA rests on three key concepts: complex social‐ecological systems, transdisciplinarity, and transformative social learning, together with Strategic Adaptive Management as the theoretically consistent operational process. We identify logical connections between the concepts and Strategic Adaptive Management so that the ASA emerges as a coherent and practical research and praxis pathway. The ASA process is then outlined to support uptake and wider application. We present findings from ASA praxis in a collaborative African research program considering river basin problems in seven countries, where key contextual learnings led to the recognition of five barriers to effective research impact outcomes: (1) Lack of an integrative conceptual grounding. (2) Participatory stakeholder engagement flawed by epistemic injustice. (3) Inadequate transdisciplinary team building. (4) Insufficient inclusion of learning, reflection, and systemic adaptation. (5) Inflated claims of probable impact in terms of creating change towards improved ecological health and social justice. We reflect on the ways the ASA contributes to breaching these barriers. Early key learnings from ASA praxis leads us to suggest that the ASA has practical value for policy makers, practitioners and researchers seeking pathways for fair and sustainable river management, and more broadly in natural resource development.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3