Both arthroscopic one‐step Broström–Gould and Lasso‐loop stitch techniques achieved favourable clinical outcomes for chronic lateral ankle instability

Author:

Liu Zhuo‐fan123,Su Tong123,Wang Zhen‐yu123,Hu Yue‐lin123,Guo Qin‐wei123,Yang Jie123,Zhang Zhu123,Liu Ning‐jing12,Jiao Chen123,Jiang Dong123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University Beijing China

2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries Beijing China

3. Engineering Research Center of Sports Trauma Treatment Technology and Devices Ministry of Education Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractPurposeBoth the arthroscopic Broström–Gould and Lasso‐loop stitch techniques are commonly used to treat chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). The purpose of this study is to introduce an arthroscopic one‐step outside‐in Broström–Gould (AOBG) technique and compare the mid‐term outcomes of the AOBG technique and Lasso‐loop stitch technique.MethodsAll CLAI patients who underwent arthroscopic lateral ankle stabilization surgery in our department from 2018 to 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods employed: the AOBG technique (Group A) and the Lasso‐loop technique (Group B). The visual analogue scale pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score, Tegner activity score and Karlsson–Peterson score were evaluated preoperatively and during the follow‐up from June to December 2022. The surgical duration, return to sports, sprain recurrence and surgical complications were also recorded and compared.ResultsA total of 74 patients (Group A, n = 42; Group B, n = 32) were included in this study with a mean follow‐up of 39 months. No statistically significant differences were observed in demographic parameters or follow‐up time between the two groups. Postoperative clinical scores indicated a significant improvement (all with p < 0.001) with no significant difference between the two groups (not significant [n.s.]). There was no significant difference in the surgical duration (46.1 vs. 49.7 min, n.s.), return to sports (92.9% vs. 93.8%, n.s.), or sprain recurrence (4.8% vs. 6.3%, n.s.). Only two cases in Group A reported knot irritation (4.8% vs. 0, n.s.), and one case in Group A experienced local skin numbness (0 vs. 3.1%, n.s.), with no significant difference.ConclusionBoth the AOBG and Lasso‐loop stitch techniques yielded comparable favourable mid‐term outcomes and return to sports with a low rate of surgical complications. Both procedures could be feasible strategies for CLAI patients.Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3