CutFEM‐based MEG forward modeling improves source separability and sensitivity to quasi‐radial sources: A somatosensory group study

Author:

Erdbrügger Tim12ORCID,Höltershinken Malte12,Radecke Jan‐Ole34,Buschermöhle Yvonne15,Wallois Fabrice6ORCID,Pursiainen Sampsa7,Gross Joachim15,Lencer Rebekka3458,Engwer Christian2,Wolters Carsten15

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster Münster Germany

2. Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster Münster Germany

3. Deptartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany

4. Center for Brain, Behaviour and Metabolism (CBBM) University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany

5. Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster Münster Germany

6. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University of Picardie Jules Verne Amiens France

7. Computing Sciences Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences Tampere University Tampere Finland

8. Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster Münster Germany

Abstract

AbstractSource analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data requires the computation of the magnetic fields induced by current sources in the brain. This so‐called MEG forward problem includes an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head. Here, we introduce the Cut finite element method (CutFEM) for the MEG forward problem. CutFEM's meshing process imposes fewer restrictions on tissue anatomy than tetrahedral meshes while being able to mesh curved geometries contrary to hexahedral meshing. To evaluate the new approach, we compare CutFEM with a boundary element method (BEM) that distinguishes three tissue compartments and a 6‐compartment hexahedral FEM in an n = 19 group study of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF). The neural generators of the 20 ms post‐stimulus SEF components (M20) are reconstructed using both an unregularized and a regularized inversion approach. Changing the forward model resulted in reconstruction differences of about 1 centimeter in location and considerable differences in orientation. The tested 6‐compartment FEM approaches significantly increase the goodness of fit to the measured data compared with the 3‐compartment BEM. They also demonstrate higher quasi‐radial contributions for sources below the gyral crowns. Furthermore, CutFEM improves source separability compared with both other approaches. We conclude that head models with 6 compartments rather than 3 and the new CutFEM approach are valuable additions to MEG source reconstruction, in particular for sources that are predominantly radial.

Funder

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Research Council of Finland

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3