Deep learning‐assisted model‐based off‐resonance correction for non‐Cartesian SWI

Author:

Daval‐Frérot Guillaume123ORCID,Massire Aurélien1,Mailhé Boris4,Nadar Mariappan4,Bapst Blanche56ORCID,Luciani Alain789,Vignaud Alexandre2ORCID,Ciuciu Philippe23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Siemens Healthineers Saint‐Denis France

2. CEA, NeuroSpin, CNRS, Paris‐Saclay University Gif‐sur‐Yvette France

3. Inria, MIND Palaiseau France

4. Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technology & Innovation Princeton New Jersey USA

5. Department of Neuroradiology, AP‐HP Henri Mondor University Hospital Créteil France

6. EA 4391, Paris‐Est‐Créteil University Créteil France

7. Department of Medical Imaging AP‐HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital Créteil France

8. Faculty of Public Health Paris‐Est‐Créteil University Créteil France

9. Inserm IMRB, U955, Equipe 18 Créteil France

Abstract

PurposePatient‐induced inhomogeneities in the static magnetic field cause distortions and blurring (off‐resonance artifacts) during acquisitions with long readouts such as in SWI. Conventional versatile correction methods based on extended Fourier models are too slow for clinical practice in computationally demanding cases such as 3D high‐resolution non‐Cartesian multi‐coil acquisitions.TheoryMost reconstruction methods can be accelerated when performing off‐resonance correction by reducing the number of iterations, compressed coils, and correction components. Recent state‐of‐the‐art unrolled deep learning architectures could help but are generally not adapted to corrupted measurements as they rely on the standard Fourier operator in the data consistency term. The combination of correction models and neural networks is therefore necessary to reduce reconstruction times.MethodsHybrid pipelines using UNets were trained stack‐by‐stack over 99 SWI 3D SPARKLING 20‐fold accelerated acquisitions at 0.6 mm isotropic resolution using different off‐resonance correction methods. Target images were obtained using slow model‐based corrections based on self‐estimated field maps. The proposed strategies, tested over 11 volumes, are compared to model‐only and network‐only pipelines.ResultsThe proposed hybrid pipelines achieved scores competing with two to three times slower baseline methods, and neural networks were observed to contribute both as pre‐conditioner and through inter‐iteration memory by allowing more degrees of freedom over the model design.ConclusionA combination of model‐based and network‐based off‐resonance correction was proposed to significantly accelerate conventional methods. Different promising synergies were observed between acceleration factors (iterations, coils, correction) and model/network that could be expanded in the future.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3