High rates of “atypical” single nucleotide polymorphism–based noninvasive prenatal screening results among consanguineous Arab American patients: A single center retrospective study

Author:

Ayyash Mariam1ORCID,Daviskiba Sydney1,Vriesen Natalie2,Yaquinto Alyxandra2,Roberson Jacquelyn2,Pitts D’Angela13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women’s Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Henry Ford Health Detroit Michigan USA

2. Division of Genetics, Department of Women’s Health Henry Ford Health Detroit Michigan USA

3. Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Women’s Health Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractNoninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), using placental cell‐free DNA from a maternal blood sample, is currently the most sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting common fetal aneuploidies. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of “atypical” single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐based NIPS results and subsequent pregnancy outcomes between Arab American and non‐Arab American patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant Arab and non‐Arab American patients who had SNP‐based NIPS performed between September 2018 and January 2021 at an urban health system in Michigan. The rate of “atypical” results and other perinatal outcomes were compared between groups using descriptive statistics. “Atypical” results due to multifetal gestations, either undisclosed or unknown at time of ordering, were excluded. Five thousand eight hundred and seventy‐three patients underwent SNP‐based NIPS: 771 (13.1%) were identified as Arab American, 5102 (86.9%) were non‐Arab American, and 49 (0.8%) patients received “atypical” results. Arab patients represented only 13.1% of patients screened (771/5873) but had a significantly higher rate of “atypical” results than non‐Arab American patients (17/771 [2.2%] vs. 32/5102 [0.6%]; p < 0.001). Of the 17 Arab patients with “atypical” results, 9 (52.9%) were in known consanguineous relationships. No major congenital anomalies or chromosomal aberrations were identified for any patients who had “atypical” results, and no significant differences in other perinatal outcomes were observed between Arab and non‐Arab American patients. A better understanding of the association between consanguinity and “atypical” SNP‐based NIPS results would aid in appropriate test selection and interpretation and may help physicians and genetic counselors provide better perinatal counseling and follow‐up care for patients in consanguineous relationships.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference24 articles.

1. The frequency of consanguineous marriages and their effects on offsprings in Tabriz city;Aboualsoltani F.;Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics,2009

2. Is There a Significant Trend in Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriage in Tehran? A Review of Three Generations

3. Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

4. Genomics‐based non‐invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women;Badeau M.;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2017

5. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3