Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis

Author:

Ullah Waqas1ORCID,Sarvepalli Deepika2ORCID,Kumar Arnav3ORCID,Zahid Salman4ORCID,Saleem Sameer5ORCID,Muhammadzai Hamza Z. U.6,Khattak Furqan7,Block Peter C.7ORCID,Jaber Wissam A.7,Shishehbor Mehdi H.8,Filby Steven J.8ORCID,Devireddy Chandan7

Affiliation:

1. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Guntur Medical College Guntur Andhra Pradesh India

3. Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Rochester General Hospital Rochester New York USA

5. University of Kentucky Bowling Green Kentucky USA

6. Abington Hospital Abington Pennsylvania USA

7. Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA

8. University Hospitals Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant severe coronary artery disease (CAD), the relative merits of a combined percutaneous (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI] and percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]] versus surgical approach (surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] and coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) remain unknown.AimsTo determine the utility of combined percutaneous versus surgical approaches in patients with severe AS and CAD.MethodsThe National Readmission Database (NRD) (2015–2019) was queried to identify all cases of TAVI+PCI and SAVR+CABG. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of mortality, stroke, and its composite (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) were calculated using a propensity‐score matched (PSM) analysis.ResultsA total of 89,314 (5358 TAVI+PCI, 83,956 SAVR+CABG) patients were included in the crude analysis. There was a gradual increase in the utilization of TAVI+PCI from 2016 to 2019 by 2%–4% per year. Using PSM, a subset of 11,361 (5358 TAVI+PCI, 6003 SAVR+CABG) patients with a balanced set of demographics and baseline comorbidities was selected. During index hospitalization, the adjusted odds of MACE (aOR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.83), and all‐cause mortality (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.81) were significantly lower in patients undergoing TAVI+PCI compared with SAVR+CABG. However, patients undergoing TAVI+PCI had a higher incidence of MACE (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05–1.87), and mortality (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22–2.50) at 30‐days. The risk of index‐admission (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62–1.09) and 30‐day (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51) stroke was similar between the two groups.ConclusionIn selected patients with severe AS and concomitant CAD, a combined percutaneous approach (TAVR+PCI) compared with SAVR+CABG may confer a lower risk of MACE and mortality during index admission but a higher incidence of 30‐day complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3