Affiliation:
1. Discipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
2. Centre for Ageing Research and Translation, Faculty of Health University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
3. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
4. Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK
5. Norfolk and Norwich NHS Trust Norwich UK
6. Department of Clinical Neurosciences Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
7. Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
8. Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK
9. Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
10. Norwich Institute of Healthy Ageing Norwich UK
Abstract
AbstractGlobal prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease has a strong sex bias, with women representing approximately two‐thirds of the patients. Yet, the role of sex‐specific risk factors during midlife, including hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and their interaction with other major risk factors for Alzheimer's Disease, such as apolipoprotein E (APOE)‐e4 genotype and age, on brain health remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between HRT (i.e., use, age of initiation and duration of use) and brain health (i.e., cognition and regional brain volumes). We then consider the multiplicative effects of HRT and APOE status (i.e., e2/e2, e2/e3, e3/e3, e3/e4 and e4/e4) via a two‐way interaction and subsequently age of participants via a three‐way interaction. Women from the UK Biobank with no self‐reported neurological conditions were included (N = 207,595 women, mean age = 56.25 years, standard deviation = 8.01 years). Generalised linear regression models were computed to quantify the cross‐sectional association between HRT and brain health, while controlling for APOE status, age, time since attending centre for completing brain health measure, surgical menopause status, smoking history, body mass index, education, physical activity, alcohol use, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, vascular/heart problems and diabetes diagnosed by doctor. Analyses of structural brain regions further controlled for scanner site. All brain volumes were normalised for head size. Two‐way interactions between HRT and APOE status were modelled, in addition to three‐way interactions including age. Results showed that women with the e4/e4 genotype who have used HRT had 1.82% lower hippocampal, 2.4% lower parahippocampal and 1.24% lower thalamus volumes than those with the e3/e3 genotype who had never used HRT. However, this interaction was not detected for measures of cognition. No clinically meaningful three‐way interaction between APOE, HRT and age was detected when interpreted relative to the scales of the cognitive measures used and normative models of ageing for brain volumes in this sample. Differences in hippocampal volume between women with the e4/e4 genotype who have used HRT and those with the e3/e3 genotype who had never used HRT are equivalent to approximately 1–2 years of hippocampal atrophy observed in typical health ageing trajectories in midlife (i.e., 0.98%–1.41% per year). Effect sizes were consistent within APOE e4/e4 group post hoc sensitivity analyses, suggesting observed effects were not solely driven by APOE status and may, in part, be attributed to HRT use. Although, the design of this study means we cannot exclude the possibility that women who have used HRT may have a predisposition for poorer brain health.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
University of Canberra