Affiliation:
1. School of Business Jiangnan University Wuxi 214122 China
2. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
Abstract
AbstractThis study examines a manufacturer selling directly to customers has three modes for acquiring end‐of‐life vehicles with a key component supplier: supplier‐collection, manufacturer‐collection, and third‐party‐collection modes. We find that the supplier, who is farther away from customers, is the optimal agent to be responsible for recovery activity. Following, we design a simple transfer price contract for the supplier‐collection mode such that the recovery rate achieves the centralized level. Subsequently, a fixed payment is proposed to compensate the supplier, thereby realizing Pareto improvement. Finally, we consider the supplier as the Stackelberg leader and find opposite results regarding optimal reverse channel structure.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities