Affiliation:
1. Program in Geosciences—Environmental Geochemistry, Chemistry Institute Fluminense Federal University Niteroi Brazil
2. Department of Thematic Studies—Environmental Change Linköping University Linköping Sweden
3. Department of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
4. Núcleo de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Federal de Rondônia Porto Velho Brazil
5. Instituto Federal de Educacao Ciencia e Tecnologia de Rondonia Porto Velho Brazil
6. Physical Geography Laboratory, Department of Geography, Graduate Program in Geography Universidade Federal Fluminense Niterói Brazil
7. Ecosystems and Global Change Laboratory (LEMG‐UFF), International Laboratory of Global Change (LINCGlobal) Biomass and Water Management Research Center (NAB‐UFF) Niteroi Brazil
8. Institute of Marine Science Federal University of São Paulo Santos Brazil
9. Unidade Multiusuario de Analises Ambientais Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Abstract
AbstractHeadwater streams are often characterized by turbulence, organic matter inputs from terrestrial systems, net heterotrophy, and the microbial loop supplying carbon and energy for consumers. However, ecological models overlook dark carbon fixation (DCF), the light‐independent inorganic carbon uptake, mainly based on chemosynthesis, using energy yields from redox reactions. The quantification of microbial biomass production, including DCF, heterotrophic production (HP), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in lotic aquatic systems, has long yet to be addressed. Here, we investigate HP and DCF in water, sediment, and litter in addition to GPP and ER from streams in pristine rainforests in three distinct sub‐basins of the Amazon River, assessing the variety of turbid, black, and clear waters. We observed mean (min–max) values of microbial biomass production of about 0.1 (0.02–1.2), 3.2 (0.8–14.1), and 0.1 (0.02–0.5) mg C m−2 h−1 in water, sediment, and litter samples, in which DCF : HP showed mean (min–max) values of 0.5 (0.2–2), 0.02 (0.001–0.07), and 0.2 (0.001–0.5). Hence, measurements yielded DCF of similar magnitude as HP in water and litter but significantly lower in sediment, indicating that DCF supplied more carbon to planktonic and litter microbes than in top sediments of streams. Literature comparisons show similar DCF and GPP, both being lower than ER in streams. Finally, we found stream DCF higher than in lentic systems, suggesting that flow and turbulence may accelerate chemosynthesis.
Funder
Ciência sem Fronteiras
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Subject
Aquatic Science,Oceanography
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献