Network enrichment significance testing in brain–phenotype association studies

Author:

Weinstein Sarah M.1ORCID,Vandekar Simon N.2ORCID,Li Bin3,Alexander‐Bloch Aaron F.45ORCID,Raznahan Armin6ORCID,Li Mingyao7ORCID,Gur Raquel E.4,Gur Ruben C.4ORCID,Roalf David R.4ORCID,Park Min Tae M.89ORCID,Chakravarty Mallar1011ORCID,Baller Erica B.4ORCID,Linn Kristin A.7,Satterthwaite Theodore D.4ORCID,Shinohara Russell T.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Temple University College of Public Health Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Computer and Information Sciences Temple University College of Science and Technology Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Section on Developmental Neurogenomics National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program Bethesda Maryland USA

7. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

9. Integrated Program in Neuroscience McGill University QC Canada

10. Department of Psychiatry McGill University QC Canada

11. Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Research Centre, McGill University QC Canada

Abstract

AbstractFunctional networks often guide our interpretation of spatial maps of brain–phenotype associations. However, methods for assessing enrichment of associations within networks of interest have varied in terms of both scientific rigor and underlying assumptions. While some approaches have relied on subjective interpretations, others have made unrealistic assumptions about spatial properties of imaging data, leading to inflated false positive rates. We seek to address this gap in existing methodology by borrowing insight from a method widely used in genetics research for testing enrichment of associations between a set of genes and a phenotype of interest. We propose network enrichment significance testing (NEST), a flexible framework for testing the specificity of brain–phenotype associations to functional networks or other sub‐regions of the brain. We apply NEST to study enrichment of associations with structural and functional brain imaging data from a large‐scale neurodevelopmental cohort study.

Funder

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation

National Institute of Mental Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3