Dementia, Sex, and Consent: Beyond the Uncomplicated Cases
-
Published:2023-05
Issue:3
Volume:53
Page:45-47
-
ISSN:0093-0334
-
Container-title:Hastings Center Report
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hastings Center Report
Author:
Gross Jed Adam,Tenenbaum Evelyn M.
Abstract
AbstractThis commentary responds to Samuel Director's article “Dementia and Concurrent Consent to Sexual Relations,” in the May‐June 2023 issue of the Hastings Center Report. In the article, Director sets out a set of conditions for sexual consent after one partner in a committed, long‐term relationship develops dementia. While we share Director's view that dementia patients should not be categorically cut off from sexual intimacy, we caution against the use of his approach as a rigid test for allowing sexual activity. Director's analysis does not address the full range of plausibly permissible sexual relationships, which is unfortunate, as intimacy has consistently been linked to physical and psychological well‐being. Moreover, because decisions about sex often carry moral and emotional overtones, we propose that a dementia patient's prior values should sometimes be considered by caregivers in a measured way.
Subject
Health Policy,Philosophy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science),Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. Dementia and Concurrent Consent to Sexual Relations
2. Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020–2060)
3. See for example A.Bianchi “Sex Dementia and Consent” (PhD diss. University of Waterloo 2018) https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/13520/Bianchi_Andria.pdf pp.55–59.
4. The Riddle of Rape‐by‐Deception and the Myth of Sexual Autonomy;Rubenfeld J.;Yale Law Journal,2013
5. Ibid. esp. 1394 (citing the theoretical work of P. Falk S. Schulhofer and J. McGregor).