The impact of novel scoring balloon and cutting balloon after orbital atherectomy on severely calcified coronary lesion as assessed by optical coherence tomography

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDebulking devices are often followed by a scoring or cutting balloon in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified lesions. However, there are limited data on balloon preparation after orbital atherectomy (OA) assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT).AimWe aimed to compare the effects of a novel scoring and cutting balloon on calcified coronary lesions with OCT.MethodsWe retrospectively examined 38 patients (38 lesions) who underwent PCI with a scoring or a cutting balloon after OA. All patients underwent pre‐PCI, preballooning, postballooning, and post‐PCI OCT imaging. We divided the patients into novel scoring‐balloon (group A: n = 22) and cutting‐balloon (group B: n = 16) groups and compared the OCT findings, including minimum lumen area (MLA) and expansion ratio (MLA divided by mean reference lumen area).ResultsThe mean patient age was 76.1 ± 8.7 years; 71.5% were male. There were no significant differences in patient background between both groups. Regarding procedural characteristics, the maximum balloon pressure was significantly higher in group A (median 23 atm, interquartile range [IQR] 18–24 vs. 12 atm [IQR: 10–12], p < 0.01). Although a calcium score of 4 was more frequently observed in group A (86.4% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.12), post‐PCI MLA was comparable between both groups (3.95 mm2 [IQR: 3.27–4.41] vs. 3.43 mm2 [IQR: 2.90–4.82], p = 0.63). Furthermore, the expansion ratio was significantly greater in group A (0.83 ± 0.20 vs. 0.68 ± 0.14, p < 0.01).ConclusionDespite a higher calcium score, a larger expansion ratio was achieved in patients with a novel scoring balloon than in those with a cutting balloon after OA.