Affiliation:
1. Department of Pain Medicine Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen China
2. Department of Spine Surgery Third Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou China
3. Department of Sports Medicine Eighth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐Sen University Shenzhen China
4. Department of Orthopaedics Putuo People's Hospital School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai China
5. Department of Orthopedics The People's Hospital of Wenshang County Wenshang Shandong China
6. Artificial Intelligence Innovation Center Research Institute of Tsinghua PearlRiverDelta Guangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can be challenging because radicular pain is not often present in the culprit‐level localization. Accurate segmentation and quantitative analysis of the lumbar dura on radiographic images are key to the accurate differential diagnosis of LSS. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic dura‐contouring tool for radiographic quantification on computed tomography myelogram (CTM) for patients with LSS.MethodsA total of 518 CTM cases with or without lumbar stenosis were included in this study. A deep learning (DL) segmentation algorithm 3‐dimensional (3D) U‐Net was deployed. A total of 210 labeled cases were used to develop the dura‐contouring tool, with the ratio of the training, independent testing, and external validation datasets being 150:30:30. The Dice score (DCS) was the primary measure to evaluate the segmentation performance of the 3D U‐Net, which was subsequently developed as the dura‐contouring tool to segment another unlabeled 308 CTM cases with LSS. Automatic masks of 446 slices on the stenotic levels were then meticulously reviewed and revised by human experts, and the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the dura was compared.ResultsThe mean DCS of the 3D U‐Net were 0.905 ± 0.080, 0.933 ± 0.018, and 0.928 ± 0.034 in the five‐fold cross‐validation, the independent testing, and the external validation datasets, respectively. The segmentation performance of the dura‐contouring tool was also comparable to that of the second observer (the human expert). With the dura‐contouring tool, only 59.0% (263/446) of the automatic masks of the stenotic slices needed to be revised. In the revised cases, there were no significant differences in the dura CSA between automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (p = 0.652). Additionally, a strong correlation of dura CSA was found between the automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (r = 0.805).ConclusionsA dura‐contouring tool was developed that could automatically segment the dural sac on CTM, and it demonstrated high accuracy and generalization ability. Additionally, the dura‐contouring tool has the potential to be applied in patients with LSS because it facilitates the quantification of the dural CSA on stenotic slices.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Basic Research Program of China