Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility

Published:2009-04-15 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Cantineau Astrid EP,Cohlen Ben J,Heineman Maas Jan

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Link

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub3/epdf/full

Reference55 articles.

1. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial;Biacchiardi;Fertility and Sterility,2004

2. Questioning the efficacy of fallopian tube sperm perfusion;Sadek;Human Reproduction,1998

3. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination;Fanchin;Fertility and Sterility,1995

4. Classical intrauterine insemination vs. fallopian tube sperm perfusion: Fecundity rates in an unselected infertility population;Filer;Fertility and Sterility,1996

5. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility;Gregoriou;Gynaecologic and Obstetric Investigation,1995

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assistierte Reproduktion;Andrologie;2023

2. Assistierte Reproduktion;Andrologie;2021

3. IUI for unexplained infertility—a network meta-analysis;Human Reproduction Update;2019-12-05

4. Inseminationsbehandlung;Reproduktionsmedizin;2019-11-28

5. Intrauterine Insemination;In Vitro Fertilization;2019