Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception

Published:2003-04-22 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Gallo MF,Grimes DA,Schulz KF

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Reference32 articles.

1. Pilot study of short-term acceptability and breakage and slippage rates for the loose-fitting polyurethane male condom eZ·on bi-directional: a randomized cross-over trial;Bounds;The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care,2002

2. Comparative evaluation of three Tactylon(TM) condoms and a latex condom during vaginal intercourse: breakage and slippage;Callahan;Contraception,2000

3. Cook L Nanda K Farr G Taylor D A comparative assessment of the eZ·on™ plastic condom and a latex condom: breakage and slippage. Final clinical study report Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC 1999

4. Randomized crossover trial comparing the eZ.on plastic condom and a latex condom;Cook;Contraception,2001

5. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study;Frezieres;Family Planning Perspectives,1998

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pilot study on functional performance and acceptability of two new synthetic adhesive male condoms (Wondaleaf): a randomized cross-over trial;Contraception;2019-07

2. Contraception and sterilization;Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology;2018-12-21

3. Economics methods in Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health related interventions;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2006-11-15

4. The Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group: synthesizing the best evidence about family planning;Contraception;2006-10

5. Travel and Sexually Transmitted Infections;Journal of Travel Medicine;2006-09-01