Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section

Published:2011-06-15 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1465-1858
Container-title:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Khunpradit Suthit¹,Tavender Emma²,Lumbiganon Pisake³,Laopaiboon Malinee⁴,Wasiak Jason⁵,Gruen Russell L⁶

Affiliation:

1. Lamphun Hospital; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 177 Jamthevee Road Lamphun Lamphun Thailand 51000

2. Monash University; Australian Satellite of the Cochrane EPOC Group, Department of Surgery; Level 6, 99 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria Australia VIC 3004

3. Khon Kaen University; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine; 123 Mitraparb Road Amphur Muang Khon Kaen Thailand 40002

4. Khon Kaen University; Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health; Khon Kaen Thailand 40002

5. Monash University, Alfred Hospital; Victorian Adult Burns Service and School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine; Commercial Road Prahran Melbourne Victoria Australia 3181

6. Alfred Hospital, Monash University; National Trauma Research Institute; Level 4, 89 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria Australia 3004

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference81 articles.

1. Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised control trial;Althabe;Lancet,2004

2. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of applied relaxation training on reducing anxiety and perceived stress in pregnant women;Bastani;Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health,2005

3. Does relaxation education in anxious primigravid Iranian women influence adverse pregnancy outcomes? A randomised controlled trial;Bastani;Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing,2006

4. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program;Bickell;Obstetrics and Gynecology,1996

5. Randomised clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch obstetric peer review system;Elferink-Stinkens;European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,2002

Cited by 98 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece through educational and behavioral interventions among maternity care providers regarding labor management: the ENGAGE stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial protocol;Trials;2024-08-19

2. The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis;Medicine;2024-02-16

3. Correlations among the maternal healthcare services in Bangladesh: An application of joint modelling technique;Heliyon;2023-12

4. District-Level Patterns of Health Insurance Coverage and Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Caesarean Section Deliveries in Public Health Facilities in India;Sustainability;2023-03-04

5. Classifying caesarean section to understand rising rates among Palestinian refugees: results from 290,047 electronic medical records across five settings;BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth;2022-12-13