Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection

Published:2006-07-19 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1465-1858
Container-title:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Tanner Judith¹,Parkinson Hazel²

Affiliation:

1. De Montfort University and University Hospitals Leicester; Charles Frears Campus 266 London Road Leicester UK LE2 1RQ

2. St James's University Hospital; Geoffrey Giles Theatres; Beckett Street Leeds UK LS9 7TF

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2/fullpdf

Reference145 articles.

1. Glove perforation rate in vascular surgery - a comparison between single and double gloving;Aarnio;VASA,2001

2. Double gloving and a system for identifying glove perforations in maxillofacial trauma surgery;Avery;British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,1999

3. Double gloving and a glove perforation indication system during the dental treatment of HIV positive patients: are they really necessary?;Avery;British Dental Journal,1999

4. A randomized controlled trial of double-versus single-gloving in vascular surgery;Berridge;Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh,1998

5. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving;Caillot;British Journal of Surgery,1999

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Needle-Stick Injuries in Ophthalmic Practice;Risk Management and Healthcare Policy;2023-08

2. Preparation for Surgery;Plastic Neurosurgery;2023

3. The management of fracture related infections: What practices can be supported by high-level evidence?;Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery;2022-09

4. Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery: An International Survey of Clinical Practices Among Expert Spine Surgeons;Global Spine Journal;2022-02-25

5. Using the MEAT VBP Framework to analyse and understand the value of surgical gloves: an explanatory case study;Health Economics Review;2021-07-06