Validating a fear‐of‐falling–related activity avoidance scale in lower limb prosthesis users

Author:

Rosenblatt Noah J.1ORCID,Major Matthew J.234ORCID,Manesh Bobak1,Schneider Kristin5,Miller Steven A.5

Affiliation:

1. Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR) at the Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science North Chicago Illinois USA

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

3. Department of Biomedical Engineering Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA

4. Jesse Brown VA Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

5. Psychology Department Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science North Chicago Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLimited available data suggest that fear of falling (FoF) may be common among lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs) and associated with negative rehabilitation outcomes. The impact of FoF on outcomes may be exacerbated when fear leads to self‐imposed declines in activity. There is a need to identify the validity of fear‐of‐falling–related activity avoidance scales in LLPUs.ObjectiveTo evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and known‐group construct validity of the modified Survey of Activities and FoF in the Elderly (mSAFE) for LLPUs. Secondarily, we sought to determine if the mSAFE scale could be reduced without losing information regarding construct validity.DesignOnline survey.SettingNot applicable.ParticipantsFifty‐nine persons with unilateral or bilateral amputation at the transtibial or transfemoral level, with ≥6 months experience using a definitive prosthesis for activities other than transfers.InterventionParticipants completed an online survey that consisted of the mSAFE and questions to assess FoF (yes/no), fear‐of‐falling–related activity avoidance (yes/no), as well as previously validated scales capturing related and unrelated constructs. T‐tests were used to compare mSAFE score between yes/no respondents for known‐group construct validity. Correlations between mSAFE and previously validated surveys assessed convergent and discriminant validity. Analyses were repeated on a reduced number of mSAFE items following a redundancy analysis.Main Outcome MeasuresNot applicable.ResultsSignificant correlation coefficients of |0.440–0.825| were found for convergent validity with evidence of known‐group construct validity (p < .021 for all comparisons). There was evidence for discriminant validity, with non‐significant associations for two‐of‐three correlations. Results from validity analyses for a shortened 6‐item mSAFE were similar to that for the full scale.ConclusionThis study provided initial evidence regarding validity of the mSAFE as a measure to assess fear‐of‐falling–related activity avoidance in LLPUs. A 6‐item scale may be appropriate if the full scale would be taxing or time‐consuming.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

U.S. Department of Defense

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3