Learning health system benefits: Development and initial validation of a framework

Author:

Welch Lisa C.1,Brewer Sarah K.1,Schleyer Titus23ORCID,Daudelin Denise1,Paranal Rechelle4,Hunt Joe D.3,Dozier Ann M.5,Perry Anna6,Cabrera Alyssa B.1,Gatto Cheryl L.7

Affiliation:

1. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Center for Biomedical Informatics Regenstrief Institute Indianapolis Indiana USA

3. Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA

4. South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

5. University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

6. Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

7. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionImplementation of research findings in clinical practice often is not realized or only partially achieved, and if so, with a significant delay. Learning health systems (LHSs) hold promise to overcome this problem by embedding clinical research and evidence‐based best practices into care delivery, enabling innovation and continuous improvement. Implementing an LHS is a complex process that requires participation and resources of a wide range of stakeholders, including healthcare leaders, clinical providers, patients and families, payers, and researchers. Engaging these stakeholders requires communicating clear, tangible value propositions. Existing models identify broad categories of benefits but do not explicate the full range of benefits or ways they can manifest in different organizations.MethodsTo develop such a framework, a working group with representatives from six Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs reviewed existing literature on LHS characteristics, models, and goals; solicited expert input; and applied the framework to their local LHS experiences.ResultsThe Framework of LHS Benefits includes six categories of benefits (quality, safety, equity, patient satisfaction, reputation, and value) relevant for a range of stakeholders and defines key concepts within each benefit. Applying the framework to five LHS case examples indicated preliminary face validity across varied LHS approaches and revealed three dimensions in which the framework is relevant: defining goals of individual LHS projects, facilitating collaboration based on shared values, and establishing guiding tenets of an LHS program or mission.ConclusionThe framework can be used to communicate the value of an LHS to different stakeholders across varied contexts and purposes, and to identify future organizational priorities. Further validation will contribute to the framework's evolution and support its potential to inform the development of tools to evaluate LHS impact.

Funder

Cook Medical

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Information Management,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3