The perspective of the logarithmic field sprayer technology

Abstract

AbstractA logarithmic sprayer was suggested about 70 years ago, but it has not yet been seriously used in research and development, and subsequent registration of plant protection products. Logarithmic sprayers have resorted to mere demonstration experiments to show end users and others how plant protection products work. Fitting dose–response curves in field experiments, however, generates much essential information, e.g., extraction of various effective field rate levels (e.g., ED20, ED50, and ED80). One of the reasons for it rarely being used in the registration of plant protection products is that the dose–response curve regression was hitherto difficult to fit; the registration requirement solely focuses on analyses of variance. Another alleged obstacle is that the logarithmic plots have systematically, not randomly distributed field rates. This paper goes through some of the problems of how to non‐randomly analyze field rates by taking autocorrelation into account to make the logarithmic sprayer palatable as registration documentation by assessing efficacy, selectivity, environmental side effects, general toxicity of plant protection products, and cost‐effectiveness. The development in precision agriculture, drone technology, and automation of data capture and subsequent analysis could make the logarithmic sprayer a cost‐effective alternative to numerous ANOVA experiments with very few fixed field rates to aid the precision spraying of pesticides and thus reduce unnecessary environmental side effects. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.