Use of intraoperative haemoadsorption in patients undergoing heart transplantation: a proof‐of‐concept randomized trial

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe aim of this trial was to compare the clinical effects of intraoperative haemoadsorption versus standard care in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).Methods and resultsIn a randomized, controlled trial, OHT recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative haemoadsorption or standard care. Outcomes were vasoactive‐inotropic score (VIS), frequency of vasoplegic syndrome (VS) in the first 24 h; post‐operative change in procalcitonin (PCT) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels; intraoperative change in mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration; frequency of post‐operative organ dysfunction, major complications, adverse immunological events and length of in‐hospital stay and 1‐year survival. Sixty patients were randomized (haemoadsorption group N = 30, control group N = 25 plus 5 exclusions). Patients in the haemoadsorption group had a lower median VIS and rate of VS (VIS: 27.2 [14.6–47.7] vs. 41.9 [22.4–63.2], P = 0.046, and VS: 20.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.028, respectively), a 6.4‐fold decrease in the odds of early VS (OR: 0.156, CI: 0.029–0.830, P = 0.029), lower PCT levels, shorter median mechanical ventilation (MV: 25 [19–68.8] hours vs. 65 [23–287] hours, P = 0.025, respectively) and intensive care unit stay (ICU stay: 8.5 [8.0–10.3] days vs. 12 [8.5–18.0] days, P = 0.022, respectively) than patients in the control group. Patients in the haemoadsorption versus control group experienced lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI: 36.7% vs. 76.0%, P = 0.004, respectively), renal replacement therapy (RRT: 0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.037, respectively) and lower median per cent change in bilirubin level (PCB: 2.5 [−24.6 to 71.1] % vs. 72.1 [11.2–191.4] %, P = 0.009, respectively) during the post‐operative period. MPA concentrations measured at pre‐defined time points were comparable in the haemoadsorption compared to control groups (MPA pre‐cardiopulmonary bypass: 2.4 [1.15–3.60] μg/mL vs. 1.6 [1.20–3.20] μg/mL, P = 0.780, and MPA 120 min after cardiopulmonary bypass start: 1.1 [0.58–2.32] μg/mL vs. 0.9 [0.45–2.10] μg/mL, P = 0.786). The rates of cardiac allograft rejection, 30‐day mortality and 1‐year survival were similar between the groups.ConclusionsIntraoperative haemoadsorption was associated with better haemodynamic stability, mitigated PCT response, lower rates of post‐operative AKI and RRT, more stable hepatic bilirubin excretion, and shorter durations of MV and ICU stay. Intraoperative haemoadsorption did not show any relevant adsorption effect on MPA. There was no increase in the frequency of early cardiac allograft rejection related to intraoperative haemoadsorption use.