Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku‐ku Tokyo 160‐8582 Japan
2. Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan
4. Department of Cardiology National Defense Medical College Tokorozawa Japan
5. AstraZeneca K.K. Osaka Japan
6. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Osaka Japan
7. Department of Cardiology Sakakibara Heart Institute Tokyo Japan
Abstract
AbstractAimsThe trajectories of systolic function after admission for acute heart failure (HF) and their effect on clinical outcomes have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to assess changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the index and 1 year after discharge and to examine their prognostic implications.Methods and resultsWe extracted data from a prospective multicentre registry of patients hospitalized for acute HF and identified 1636 patients with LVEF data at admission and 1 year after discharge. We categorized them into five groups based on LVEF changes: HF with unchanged‐preserved EF [HFunc‐pEF (EF ≥ 50%); N = 527, 32.2%], unchanged‐mildly reduced EF [HFunc‐mrEF (EF 41–49%); N = 86, 5.3%], unchanged‐reduced EF [HFunc‐rEF (EF ≤ 40%); N = 377, 23.0%], worsened EF (HFworEF; N = 83, 5.1%), and improved EF (HFimpEF; N = 563, 34.4%). We then evaluated the subsequent composite outcome of cardiovascular death and HF readmission. During 1 year after discharge, 53% of patients with HF with reduced EF and 67% of those with HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) transitioned to other categories, whereas 92% of those with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) remained within the same category. Patients with HFimpEF were more likely to be younger and had relatively preserved renal function, whereas those with HFworEF were the oldest and had more comorbidities among the five groups. After multivariable adjustment, patients with HFimpEF and HFunc‐pEF had a lower risk for composite outcomes when referenced to patients with HFunc‐rEF [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), P‐value: 0.28 (0.16–0.49), P < 0.001, and 0.40 (0.25–0.63), P < 0.001, respectively]. Conversely, patients with HFunc‐mrEF and HFworEF had a comparable risk [0.44 (0.18–1.07), P = 0.07, and 0.63 (0.29–1.39), P = 0.26, respectively].ConclusionsA substantial number of patients with HF experienced transitions to other categories after discharge. Notably, patients with decreased EF experienced a worse prognosis, even with slight decreases (e.g. HFpEF transitioning to HFmrEF). These findings emphasize the significance of longitudinal assessments of systolic function to better manage patients following acute decompensation.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Japanese Circulation Society
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献