Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Kyushu Rosai Hospital Kitakyushu Japan
2. Department of Plastic Surgery Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundConcomitant resection of the sciatic nerve along with a malignant tumor is no longer a contraindication for limb‐sparing surgery, as most of these patients remain ambulatory. However, sciatic nerve reconstruction after sarcoma resection is not commonly performed. Restoration of nerve function can improve patient quality of life. We describe our experience with four patients who underwent sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft at the time of sarcoma resection.MethodsBecause of the low chance of peroneal nerve recovery, the ipsilateral peroneal trunk was used as a graft to reconstruct the tibial trunk of the sciatic nerve. Two patients were men and two were women. Mean age was 45.3 years (range, 15–62). Mean sciatic nerve defect length was 9.4 cm (range, 8.5–12.0). Proximal thigh defects (three patients) were reconstructed with a double cable; the one patient with a distal thigh defect underwent single cable reconstruction. Mean operation time was 492 min (range, 428–682).ResultsMean length of the harvested peroneal trunks was 21 cm (range, 11–26). Mean graft length was 11.9 cm (range, 11–13). Postoperative course was uneventful in all four patients. One patient died of sarcoma lung metastasis and could not be evaluated. Three patients were followed for more than 2 years. Two patients achieved British Medical Research Council grade 4 plantar flexion; the remaining patient achieved grade 5 plantar flexion and grade 4 toe flexion. Semmes–Weinstein monofilament sensory testing showed loss of protective sensation on the plantar surface in all three. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores at last follow‐up were 60.0%, 70.0%, and 43.3%, respectively.ConclusionsImmediate sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft avoids reconstruction delay and scar tissue formation, which is advantageous for nerve recovery. This technique may be considered when sciatic nerve resection is anticipated during sarcoma resection.