Drop‐off in axonal regeneration along the length of a cross‐face nerve graft: An experimental study in rats

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe average nerve graft length utilized in cross‐face nerve grafting for reconstruction of facial nerve palsy is 20–22 cm. While the graft length is thought to be one of the greatest determinants of muscle strength, the mechanism through which this happens remains unknown. We studied changes in axonal regeneration along the length of a 2 cm cross‐face nerve graft in a rat model. The hypothesis was that axon count would decrease along the length of the graft.MethodsA 2 cm nerve graft (sciatic nerve) was used as a cross‐face nerve graft in 16 adult female, 210–250 g, Sprague Dawley rats. Thirteen weeks later, 5 mm nerve biopsies were taken at four sites: the facial nerve trunk (control), proximal graft, midpoint of graft (1 cm distal to coaptation) and distal graft (2 cm distal to coaptation). Retrograde nerve labeling with FluoroGold was performed at the biopsied nerve site and the facial motor nucleus was taken 1 week later. Microscopic imaging and manual counting of axons and labeled motor nuclei was performed.ResultsRetrograde‐labeled motor neuron counts were decreased at the midway point of the graft compared to the facial trunk (1517 ± 335 axons, Δ% = 92.5, p = .01) and even further decreased at the distal end of the graft (269 ± 293 axons, Δ% = 175.5, p = .006). Analysis of the nerve biopsies demonstrated no significant differences in myelinated axon count between the nerve trunk and over the length of the nerve graft (range 6207–7179 axons, Δ% = 14.5, p = .07).ConclusionIn a rat model, the number of regenerating motor neurons drops off along the length of the graft and axon count is preserved due to axon sprouting. How this pattern correlates to ultimate muscle strength remains unknown, but this study provides insight into why shorter grafts may afford better outcomes.