Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction

Author:

Dauplat J1,Kwiatkowski F1ORCID,Rouanet P2,Delay E3,Clough K4,Verhaeghe J L5,Raoust I6,Houvenaeghel G7,Lemasurier P8,Thivat E1,Pomel C1,Abrial C9,Afonso J9,Bannier M10,Body G11,Baron M12,Bergzoll C9,Chauvet M P13,Classe J M14,Cothier-Savey I15,Dejode M16,Dessogne P12,Doridot V16,Durando X9,Faucher A17,Faure C18,Figl A19,Fitoussi A20,Flipo B19,Fondrinier E21,Garbay J R22,Giacalone P L23,Gimbergue P9,Guillemin F24,Gutowski M25,Houpeau J L13,Inguenault C26,Lambaudie E10,Lantieri L27,Le Bouedec G9,Lepage C27,Loustalot C28,Machiavello J C19,Monrigal E9,Mourregot A25,Nos C26,Paradol P O18,Rimareix F22,Rodier J F29,Rouzier R30,Saint-Aubert B25,Salmon R J20,Scherer C16,Toussoun G18,Tunon de Lara C12,Uzan S30,Weitbruch D27,

Affiliation:

1. Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France

2. Centre Val d'Aurelle Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France

3. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

4. Institut du Sein, Paris, France

5. Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine – Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

6. Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

7. Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

8. Centre René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France

9. Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand

10. Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille

11. Hôpital Bretonneau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours

12. Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen

13. Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille

14. Centre René Gauducheau Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblin

15. Centre René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud

16. Pôle Santé République, Clermont Ferrand

17. Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux

18. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon

19. Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice

20. Institut Curie, Paris

21. Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre Paul Papin, Angers

22. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif

23. Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier

24. Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine – Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-, Nancy

25. Centre Val d'Aurelle Paul Lamarque, Montpellier

26. Institut du Sein, Paris

27. Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil

28. Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon

29. Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg

30. Hôpital Tenon, Paris

Abstract

Abstract Background Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a surgical strategy in breast cancer when breast-conserving surgery is not an option. There is a lack of evidence showing an advantage of mastectomy plus IBR over mastectomy alone on health-related quality of life (QoL). Methods A large prospective multicentre survey, STIC-RMI (support of innovative and expensive techniques – immediate breast reconstruction), was undertaken to study the changes in QoL in patients treated by mastectomy with or without IBR. Patients were recruited between 2007 and 2009. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 instruments were used to assess QoL before operation, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. A propensity score was used to compare QoL between mastectomy alone and mastectomy plus IBR, with limited bias. Results A total of 595 patients were included from 22 French academic hospitals, of whom 407 (68·4 per cent) underwent IBR. One-year data were available for 71·1 per cent of patients. Factors associated with IBR were age, histological tumour type, palpable nodes and an attempt at breast-conserving surgery. At inclusion, QoL was significantly better in the IBR group (P < 0·001) and there was no significant change in either group during 1 year compared with baseline. Results for the QLQ-BR23 functional dimension varied according to propensity score quartiles; IBR had no influence in the lowest quartile. In the upper quartiles, QoL increased slightly over the year among patients who had IBR, whereas it decreased among those who had mastectomy alone (P = 0·037). Satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome strongly influenced QoL, especially in upper quartiles (P < 0·001). However, an unsatisfactory outcome after IBR was still considered a better condition than simple mastectomy. Conclusion The QoL benefit provided by IBR depends on patients' life status at inclusion; young active women with an in situ tumour are more likely to preserve their QoL after IBR.

Funder

INCa

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 95 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3