Myositis‐related autoantibody profile and clinical characteristics stratified by anti‐cytosolic 5′‐nucleotidase 1A status in connective tissue diseases

Author:

Diederichsen Louise Pyndt12ORCID,Iversen Line Vinderslev34,Nielsen Christoffer Tandrup1,Jacobsen Søren1,Hermansen Marie‐Louise1,Witting Nanna5ORCID,Cortes Rikke6,Korsholm Sine Søndergaard12,Krogager Markus Engebæk5,Friis Tina67

Affiliation:

1. Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Rheumatology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

3. Department of Dermatology Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Dermatology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

5. Department of Neurology Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Congenital Disorders Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen Denmark

7. Department of Autoimmunology and Biomarkers Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/AimsCytosolic 5′‐nucleotidase 1A (cN‐1A) autoantibodies have been recognized as myositis‐related autoantibodies. However, their correlations with clinical characteristics and other myositis‐specific and myositis‐associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs) are still unclear. We aimed to establish the prevalence and clinical and laboratory associations of cN‐1A autoantibodies in a cohort of patients with connective tissue diseases.MethodsA total of 567 participants (182 idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM], 164 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], 121 systemic sclerosis [SSc], and 100 blood donors [BD]) were tested for the presence of cN‐1A autoantibodies and other myositis‐specific and myositis‐associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs). Clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared between anti‐cN‐1A positive and negative patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and between anti‐cN‐1A positive and negative patients with non‐IBM IIM.ResultsIn the sIBM cohort, 30 patients (46.9%) were anti‐cN‐1A positive vs. 18 (15.2%) in the non‐IBM IIM cohort, 17 (10%) were anti‐cN‐1A positive in the SLE cohort and none in the SSc or the BD cohorts. Anti‐cN‐1A positivity had an overall sensitivity of 46.9% and a specificity of 93.2% for sIBM. Dysphagia was more frequent in the anti‐cN‐1A positive vs. negative sIBM patients (p = .04). In the non‐IBM IIM group, being anti‐cN‐1A antibody positive was associated with the diagnosis polymyositis (p = .04) and overlap‐myositis (p = .04) and less disease damage evaluated by physician global damage score (p < .001).DiscussioncN‐1A autoantibodies were predominantly found in IIM patients and was associated with dysphagia in sIBM patients. Notably, anti‐cN‐1A appears to identify a distinct phenotype of anti‐cN‐1A positive non‐IBM IIM patients with a milder disease course.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical),Physiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3