Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience

Author:

Martínez‐Meñaca Amaya1ORCID,Cruz‐Utrilla Alejandro2ORCID,Mora‐Cuesta Víctor Manuel1ORCID,Luna‐López Raquel2ORCID,Segura‐de la Cal Teresa2ORCID,Flox‐Camacho Ángela2ORCID,Alonso‐Lecue Pilar3ORCID,Escribano‐Subias Pilar45ORCID,Cifrián‐Martínez José Manuel6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Respiratory Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Santander Spain

2. Cardiology Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid Spain

3. IDIVAL (Valdecilla Research Institute) Santander Spain

4. Cardiology Department, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid Spain

5. ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Facultad de Medicina Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain

6. Respiratory Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain

Abstract

AbstractA simplified 4‐strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow‐up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 02 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on risk stratification by this scale. We included 180 prevalent patients with PAH from two reference hospitals in Spain, followed up between 2006 and 2022. Patients were included if all the variables of interest were available within a 3‐month period on the Spanish Registry of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (REHAP): functional class (FC); NT‐proBNP; 6MWT; and CPET. The original 4‐strata model (NT‐proBNP, 6MWT, FC) identified most patients at low or intermediate‐low risk (36.7% and 51.1%, respectively). Notably, the modified scale (NT‐proBNP, CPET, FC) improved the identification of patients at intermediate‐high risk up to 18.9%, and at high risk up to 1.1% in comparison with the previous 12.2% and 0.0% in the original scale. This new model increased the number of patients correctly classified into higher‐risk strata (positive NRI of 0.06), as well as classified more patients without events in lower‐risk strata (negative NRI of 0.04). The proposed score showed a slightly superior prognostic capacity compared with the original model (Harrel's C‐index 0.717 vs. 0.709). Using O2 uptake instead of distance walked in the 6MWT improves the identification of high‐risk patients using the 4‐strata scale. This change could have relevant prognostic implications and lead to changes in the specific treatment of PAH.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3