Prospective evaluation of implants‐supported, tooth‐implant supported, and teeth‐supported 3‐unit posterior monolithic zirconia fixed restorations: Bite force and patient satisfaction

Author:

Altayyar Sadeq1,Al‐zordk Walid2,Algabri Radwan13ORCID,Rajah Eshraq4,Al‐baadani Abdulsattar5,Alqutaibi Ahmed Yaseen67,Madina Manal Abo2,Ghazy Mohammed H.2

Affiliation:

1. Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry IBB University Ibb Yemen

2. Fixed Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Mansoura Egypt

3. Prosthodontic Department, National University Ibb‐Branch Ibb Yemen

4. Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry Sana'a University Sana'a Yemen

5. Fixed Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry Dhamar University Dhamar Yemen

6. Department of Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry, College of Dentistry Taibah University Al Madinah Saudi Arabia

7. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry Ibb University Ibb Yemen

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the maximum bite force (MBF) and satisfaction of patients restored with implants, combined tooth‐implants, and teeth‐supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).Materials and MethodsThirty partially edentulous patients in need of three units of FDPs in their mandibular posterior region were divided into three equal groups (n = 10) as follows: Group‐1 patients received two implants for each at the second premolar and second molar regions, Group‐2 patients received one implant for each at the second molar region, and Group‐3 patients with missing lower first molar. All the restorations were constructed from monolithic zirconia. Patients were evaluated 1 week after placement of restorations (baseline) and then after 6, 12, and 24‐month intervals for MBF using force transducer occlusal force meter and satisfaction (function, esthetic, and overall satisfaction) using a visual analog scale.ResultsThe mean MBF for Group 1 was higher than Group 2 (p = .044) but not that of Group 3 (p = .923). Additionally, Group 3 displayed a higher MBF than Group 2, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = .096). Concerning patient satisfaction, all study groups reported high levels of satisfaction across all satisfaction elements, and no significant differences were observed between the groups.ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Group 1 gives comparable anticipated treatment outcomes as Group 3 concerning biting force and patient satisfaction. However, Group 2 gives comparable satisfaction results with biting force value within the normal range; thus, it might be used as a treatment option in a specific situation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3