Combining Super Learner with high‐dimensional propensity score to improve confounding adjustment: A real‐world application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Author:

Dhopeshwarkar Neil12ORCID,Yang Wei12,Hennessy Sean12,Rhodes Joanna M.3,Cuker Adam45,Leonard Charles E.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Real‐World Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics and the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Northwell Health New Hyde Park New York USA

4. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeHigh‐dimensional propensity score (hdPS) is a semiautomated method that leverages a vast number of covariates available in healthcare databases to improve confounding adjustment. A novel combined Super Learner (SL)‐hdPS approach was proposed to assist with selecting the number of covariates for propensity score inclusion, and was found in plasmode simulation studies to improve bias reduction and precision compared to hdPS alone. However, the approach has not been examined in the applied setting.MethodsWe compared SL‐hdPS's performance with that of several hdPS models, each with prespecified covariates and a different number of empirically‐identified covariates, using a cohort study comparing real‐world bleeding rates between ibrutinib‐ and bendamustine‐rituximab (BR)‐treated individuals with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics® Data Mart commercial claims database (2013–2020). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting for confounding adjustment and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for bleeding outcomes. Parameters of interest included prespecified and empirically‐identified covariate balance (absolute standardized difference [ASD] thresholds of <0.10 and <0.05) and outcome HR precision (95% confidence intervals).ResultsWe identified 2423 ibrutinib‐ and 1102 BR‐treated individuals. Including >200 empirically‐identified covariates in the hdPS model compromised covariate balance at both ASD thresholds. SL‐hdPS balanced more covariates than all individual hdPS models at both ASD thresholds. The bleeding HR 95% confidence intervals were generally narrower with SL‐hdPS than with individual hdPS models.ConclusionIn a real‐world application, hdPS was sensitive to the number of covariates included, while use of SL for covariate selection resulted in improved covariate balance and possibly improved precision.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3