Use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support for right ventricular failure

Author:

Gupta Kartik1ORCID,Lemor Alejandro2,Alkhatib Ahmad3,McBride Patrick4,Cowger Jennifer1,Grafton Gillian1,Alaswad Khaldoon1ORCID,O'Neill William1,Villablanca Pedro1,Basir Mir B.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA

2. Division of Cardiology University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson Mississippi USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas USA

4. Division of General Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUtilization of right ventricular mechanical circulatory support (RV‐MCS) devices has been limited by a lack of recognition of RV failure as well as a lack of availability and experience with RV‐MCS.AimsWe report a single‐center experience with the use of percutaneous RV‐MCS and report predictors of adverse outcomes.MethodsThis was a single‐center retrospective cohort study. Data from consecutive patients who received RV‐MCS for any indication between June 2015 and January 2022 were included. Data on baseline comorbidities, hemodynamics, and laboratory values were collected. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality analyzed as a logistic outcome in a multivariable model. These variables were further ranked by their predictive value.ResultsAmong 58 consecutive patients enrolled, the median age was 66 years, 31% were female and 53% were white. The majority of the patients (48%) were hospitalized for acute on chronic heart failure. The majority of the patients were SCAI SHOCK Stage D (67%) and 34 (64%) patients had MCS placed within 24 h of the onset of shock. Before placement of RV‐MCS, median central venous pressure (CVP) and RV stroke work index were 20 mmHg and 8.9 g m/m2, respectively. Median serum lactate was 3.5 (1.6, 6.2) mmol/L. Impella RP was implanted in 50% and ProtekDuo in the remaining 50%. Left ventricular MCS was concomitantly used in 66% of patients. Twenty‐eight patients (48.3%) died. In these patients, median serum lactate was significantly higher (4.1 [2.3, 13.0] vs. 2.2 [1.4, 4.0]  mmol/L, p = 0.007) and a trend toward higher median CVP (24 [18, 31] vs. 19 [14, 24] mmHg, p = 0.052). In the multivariable logistic model, both serum lactate and CVP before RV‐MCS placement were independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality. Serum lactate had the highest predictive value.ConclusionIn our real‐world cohort, 52% of patients treated with RV‐MCS survived their index hospitalization. Serum lactate at presentation and CVP were the strongest predictors of in‐hospital mortality.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3