Behavioral biases in short selling—An experimental study

Author:

Eskinazi Naveh1,Shavit Tal1ORCID,Rosenboim Mosi2ORCID,Malul Miki2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Department of Economics and Business Administration Ariel University Ariel Israel

2. Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management Ben‐Gurion University of The Negev Be'er‐Sheva Israel

Abstract

AbstractShort selling is a common practice in financial markets. Although there is extensive research concerning short selling and short sellers, in the behavioral and experimental economics literature, there are only a few studies that examine it. This paper investigates the pricing of two forms of short selling both theoretically and experimentally—selling a lottery short and paying to close the short position. The theoretical framework presents and analyzes the two positions and the influence of the anchoring and uncertainty effects on the pricing. To test the theoretical framework, we asked participants in an experiment about the price they were willing to accept for the obligation to pay the lottery's outcome and the price they were willing to pay to close the obligation to pay the lottery's outcome they held. Moreover, we used a simple lottery with different framings, each one with a different anchor. Our results suggest that in the short‐selling position, behavioral biases, such as anchoring and uncertainty, impact the decision‐makers' bid prices.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference34 articles.

1. Short‐selling bans around the world: Evidence from the 2007–09 crisis;Beber A.;The Journal of Finance,2013

2. In short supply: Short‐sellers and stock returns;Beneish M. D.;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2015

3. Short selling and the price discovery process;Boehmer E.;The Review of Financial Studies,2013

4. Supply and demand shifts in the shorting market;Cohen L.;The Journal of Finance,2007

5. Short‐sellers, fundamental analysis, and stock returns;Dechow P. M.;Journal of Financial Economics,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3