A randomized controlled trial of a distress screening, consultation, and targeted referral system for family caregivers in oncologic care

Author:

Applebaum Allison J.1ORCID,Schofield Elizabeth1ORCID,Kastrinos Amanda1ORCID,Gebert Rebecca1ORCID,Behrens Mia1,Loschiavo Morgan1ORCID,Shaffer Kelly M.2,Levine Marcia3,Dannaoui Aimee3,Bellantoni Courtney3,Miller Melissa F.4ORCID,Zaleta Alexandra K.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

2. Center for Behavioral Health and Technology University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA

3. Department of Nursing Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

4. Research and Training Institute Cancer Support Community Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveDistress screening is standard practice among oncology patients, yet few routine distress screening programs exist for cancer caregivers. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Cancer Support Source‐CaregiverTM (CSS‐CG, 33‐item), an electronic distress screening and automated referral program with a consultation (S + C) to improve caregiver unmet needs, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and distress relative to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC; access to educational materials).Method150 caregivers of patients with varying sites/stages of cancer were randomized to S + C or EUC and completed assessments at baseline, 3‐months post‐baseline, and 6‐months post‐baseline. A subset of participants (n = 10) completed in‐depth qualitative interviews.ResultsS + C was feasible: among 75 caregivers randomized to S + C, 66 (88%) completed CSS‐CG and consultation. Top concerns reported were: (1) patient's pain and/or physical discomfort; (2) patient's cancer progressing/recurring; and (3) feeling nervous or afraid.Differences between groups in improvements on outcomes by T2 and T3 were modest (ds < 0.53) in favor of S + C. Qualitative data underscored the helpfulness of S + C in connecting caregivers to support and helping them feel cared for and integrated into cancer care.ConclusionsS + C is feasible, acceptable, and yields more positive impact on emotional well‐being than usual care. Future studies will examine programmatic impact among caregivers experiencing higher acuity of needs, and benefits of earlier integration of S + C on caregiver, patient, and healthcare system outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. The Characteristics of Informal Cancer Caregivers in the United States

2. What Is a Cancer Caregiver?2023. Accessed 16 April 2023.https://www.cancer.org/treatment/caregivers/what‐a‐caregiver‐does/who‐and‐what‐are‐caregivers.html

3. The Family Caregiving Crisis Meets an Actual Pandemic

4. Informal Caregiving and the Risk for Coronary Heart Disease: The Whitehall II Study

5. Mortality after the Hospitalization of a Spouse

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3