Inference for joint quantile and expected shortfall regression

Author:

Peng Xiang1ORCID,Judy Wang Huixia2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Merck Research Laboratories Merck & Co Upper Gwynedd Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Statistics The George Washington University Washington, DC USA

Abstract

AbstractQuantiles and expected shortfalls are commonly used risk measures in financial risk management. The two measurements are correlated while having distinguished features. In this project, our primary goal is to develop a stable and practical inference method for the conditional expected shortfall. We consider the joint modelling of conditional quantile and expected shortfall to facilitate the statistical inference procedure. While the regression coefficients can be estimated jointly by minimizing a class of strictly consistent joint loss functions, the computation is challenging, especially when the dimension of parameters is large since the loss functions are neither differentiable nor convex. We propose a two‐step estimation procedure to reduce the computational effort by first estimating the quantile regression parameters with standard quantile regression. We show that the two‐step estimator has the same asymptotic properties as the joint estimator, but the former is numerically more efficient. We develop a score‐type inference method for hypothesis testing and confidence interval construction. Compared to the Wald‐type method, the score method is robust against heterogeneity and is superior in finite samples, especially for cases with many confounding factors. The advantages of our proposed method over existing approaches are demonstrated by simulations and empirical studies based on income and college education data.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability

Reference29 articles.

1. When Opportunity Knocks, Who Answers?: New Evidence on College Achievement Awards

2. Thinking coherently;Artzner P.;Risk,1997

3. Coherent Measures of Risk

4. Barendse S.(2020).Efficiently weighted estimation of tail and interquantile expectations. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2017‐034/III Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937665orhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2937665

5. Basel Committee. (2013).Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework. Available at:https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs265.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3