Robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty reduces postoperative complications and length of stay without increased cost compared to navigation‐guided techniques: A national analysis

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThis study compares postoperative outcomes of robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) versus navigation‐guided total knee arthroplasty (NG‐TKA). Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data, it provides an analysis of postoperative complications, mortality, hospital costs and duration of stay.MethodsThe study analysed 217,715 patients (81,830 RA‐TKA; 135,885 NG‐TKA) using NIS data from 2016 to 2019. Elective TKA patients were identified through the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression modelling, were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and MATLAB.ResultsRA‐TKA patients were younger (66.1 vs. 67.1 years, p < 0.0001) and had similar mortality rates (0.024% vs. 0.018%, p = 0.342) but shorter length of stay (LOS) (1.89 vs. 2.1 days, p < 0.0001). Mean total charges were comparable between RA‐TKA ($66,180) and NG‐TKA ($66,251, p = 0.669). RA‐TKA demonstrated lower incidences of blood‐related complications (11.67% vs. 14.19%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary oedema (0.0306% vs. 0.066%, p < 0.0001), deep vein thrombosis (0.196% vs. 0.254%, p = 0.006) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (1.356% vs. 1.483%, p = 0.016).ConclusionRA‐TKA reduces postoperative complications and LOS without increasing costs, highlighting the relevance of this technology in patient care.Level of EvidenceLevel III.