Brief cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders symptomatology among a mixed sample of adolescents and young adults in primary care: A non‐randomised feasibility and pilot study

Author:

Hart Melissa123,Hirneth Stephen2,Mendelson Jane4,Jenkins Laura3,Pursey Kirrilly12ORCID,Waller Glenn5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Food and Nutrition Research Program Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia

2. School of Health Sciences University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia

3. Hunter New England Mental Health Service Newcastle New South Wales Australia

4. Hunter New England Central Coast Primary Health Network Tamworth New South Wales Australia

5. University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveBrief and accessible therapies for people with an eating disorder is an important health target. Ten‐session cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT‐T) is a brief treatment evaluated in people with a non‐underweight eating disorder. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of CBT‐T for young people in primary care.MethodThis cohort pilot study used group (adolescents vs. young adults) by time (over four time points) Generalised Linear Mixed Model analysis. Participants included 13–25‐year‐olds attending an early intervention mental health service, receiving 10 sessions of CBT‐T. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment, retention and satisfaction. Eating and other pathology measures were administered at baseline, weeks four and 10, and 12‐week follow‐up.ResultsOf the 63 commencing treatment, 38 completed 10 CBT‐T sessions (60%). Most (94%) reported high treatment satisfaction. Significant reductions in eating pathology, depression and stress were found. Age group did not yield differences in CBT‐T outcome, with large to very large effect sizes across outcome variables. Anxiety was associated with attrition.ConclusionThis study provides preliminary support for the use of CBT‐T in primary care, across adolescence and early adulthood. Findings require replication in other clinical settings and comparison to other clinical approaches and control populations.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3