Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program

Published:2021-11-30 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1522-1946
Container-title:Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
language:en
Short-container-title:Cathet Cardio Intervent

Author:

Bhardwaj Bhaskar¹²^ORCID,Gunzburger Elise³,Valle Javier A.³,Grunwald Gary K.³⁴,Plomondon Mary E.⁵,Vidovich Mladen I.⁶^ORCID,Aggarwal Kul¹²,Karuparthi Poorna Raj¹²

Affiliation:

1. Section of Cardiology Harry S. Truman VA Hospital Columbia Missouri USA

2. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA

3. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System Veterans Health Administration Aurora Colorado USA

4. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

5. VA CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety Veterans Health Administration Washington District of Columbia USA

6. Section of Cardiology Jesse Brown VA Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ccd.30024

Reference39 articles.

1. An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

2. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention

3. Trans-Radial versus Trans-Femoral Intervention for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations: Results from Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry

4. Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for the treatment of left main coronary bifurcations: results from the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation stenting) II registry;Chung S;J Invasive Cardiol,2015

5. Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program;The American Journal of Cardiology;2024-07

2. Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the VA CART Program;2023-10-28

3. Revealing concealed cardioprotection by platelet Mfsd2b-released S1P in human and murine myocardial infarction;Nature Communications;2023-04-26