Sequencing vs. amplification for the estimation of allele dosages in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)

Abstract

AbstractPremiseDetecting single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cost‐effective way is fundamental in any plant breeding pipeline. Here, we compare three genotyping techniques for their ability to reproduce the allele dosage of SNPs of interest in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.).MethodsTo identify a reproducible technique to estimate allele dosage for the validation of SNP markers, the correlation between Flex‐Seq, kompetitive allele‐specific PCR (KASP), and genotyping‐by‐sequencing and restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (GBS+RADseq) was determined for a set of 76 SNPs. To find alternative methodologies for allele dosage estimation, the KASP and Flex‐Seq techniques were compared for the same set of SNPs. For the three techniques, a population of 53 genotypes from the diverse sugarcane panel of the Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar (Cenicaña), Colombia, was selected.ResultsThe average Pearson correlation coefficients between GBS+RADseq and Flex‐Seq, GBS+RADseq and KASP, and Flex‐Seq and KASP were 0.62 ± 0.27, 0.38 ± 0.27, and 0.38 ± 0.30, respectively.DiscussionFlex‐Seq reproduced the allele dosages determined using GBS+RADseq with good levels of precision because of its depth of sequencing and ability to target specific positions in the genome. Additionally, Flex‐Seq outperformed KASP by allowing the conversion of a higher number of SNPs and a more accurate estimation of the allele dosage. Flex‐Seq has therefore become the genotyping methodology of choice for marker validation at Cenicaña.