Why all clinical guideline recommendations are ‘Conditional’

Author:

Wyer Peter C.1ORCID,Gabbay John2,Suh Edward H.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Columbia University New York New York USA

2. Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK

Abstract

Highlights The impact of clinical guidelines on practitioner behaviour and clinical care remains in doubt. The acceptability of a 5‐ or 10‐year delay in producing a ‘strong’ clinically important recommendation is unlikely to hold. Practitioners think holistically, in contrast to the analytical thinking that characterizes clinical research. Rapidly accessible, flexible, ‘knowledge‐in‐practice‐in‐context’ cannot be simply replaced by a focused piece of new research or guideline.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference29 articles.

1. Practice Policies: Where Do They Come From?

2. From MARS to MAGIC: The remarkable journey through time and space of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation initiative

3. Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2011.

4. Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2011.

5. Stakeholder-Driven Quality Improvement: A Compelling Force for Clinical Practice Guidelines

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3