A shared decision‐making model about care for people with severe dementia: A qualitative study based on nutrition and hydration decisions in acute hospitals

Author:

Anantapong Kanthee12ORCID,Sampson Elizabeth L.13ORCID,Davies Nathan14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department UCL Division of Psychiatry University College London London UK

2. Department of Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Thailand

3. Department of Psychological Medicine Royal London Hospital East London NHS Foundation Trust London UK

4. Centre for Ageing Population Studies Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo understand the decision‐making processes regarding eating and drinking for hospital patients with severe dementia and use this data to modify a decision‐making model about care for people with severe dementia.MethodsFrom January to May 2021, qualitative semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 29 family carers and hospital staff in England who cared for people with severe dementia during hospital admissions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using codebook thematic analysis.ResultsWe demonstrated a modified decision‐making model consisting of six stages of the decision‐making process: (i) identify a decision to be made; (ii) exchange information and recognise emotions; (iii) clarify values and preferences of all involved; (iv) consider feasibility of each choice; (v) share preferred choice and make a final decision; and (vi) deliver the decision, monitor outcomes and renegotiation. From this study, decision‐making needed to be shared among all people involved and address holistic needs and personal values of people with dementia and family carers. However, hospital staff often made assumptions about the persons' ability to eat and drink without adequate consultation with family carers. The process was impacted by ward culture, professional practice, and legal framework, which might overlook cultural and personal beliefs of the persons and families. Treatment escalation plans could help inform stepwise treatments, create realistic expectations, and guide future decisions.ConclusionsOur decision‐making model provides clear stages of decision‐making processes and can be used to guide clinical practice and policy around care decisions for eating and drinking, which is often poorly supported.

Funder

Marie Curie

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University

Alzheimer's Society

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3