Psychosocial factors impacting barriers and motivators to cancer genetic testing

Author:

Hanson Erika N.1ORCID,Delacroix Emerson2ORCID,Austin Sarah1,Carr Grant3,Kidwell Kelley M.3,Bacon Elizabeth4ORCID,Gerido Lynette Hammond2,Griggs Jennifer J.567,Stoffel Elena M.17,Resnicow Ken27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Education University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Center for Health Communications Research, Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

6. School of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

7. University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOnly a small proportion of patients who qualify for clinical genetic testing for cancer susceptibility get testing. Many patient‐level barriers contribute to low uptake. In this study, we examined self‐reported patient barriers and motivators for cancer genetic testing.MethodsA survey comprised of both new and existing measures related to barriers and motivators to genetic testing was emailed to patients with a diagnosis of cancer at a large academic medical center. Patients who self‐reported receiving a genetic test were included in these analyses (n = 376). Responses about emotions following testing as well as barriers and motivators prior to getting testing were examined. Group differences in barriers and motivators by patient demographic characteristics were examined.ResultsBeing assigned female at birth was associated with increased emotional, insurance, and family concerns as well as increased health benefits compared to patients assigned male at birth. Younger respondents had significantly higher emotional and family concerns compared to older respondents. Recently diagnosed respondents expressed fewer concerns about insurance implications and emotional concerns. Those with a BRCA‐related cancer had higher scores on social and interpersonal concerns scale than those with other cancers. Participants with higher depression scores indicated increased emotional, social and interpersonal, and family concerns.ConclusionsSelf‐reported depression emerged as the most consistent factor influencing report of barriers to genetic testing. By incorporating mental health resources into clinical practice, oncologists may better identify those patients who might need more assistance following through with a referral for genetic testing and the response afterwards.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3